WatchmenComicMovie.com Forum


Talk about the Watchmen comic book mini-series and film
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:49 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
Godziller66 wrote:
http://klockworkkugler.com/2010/10/20/what-could-have-been-darren-aronofskys-batman-year-one/


What the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck :lol: ?

Yeah, maybe I would've liked the movie, by knowing for sure that it's deffinitely not the Batman I'm used to.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:55 pm 
Offline
...look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:43 am
Posts: 2175
feliciano182 wrote:
Godziller66 wrote:
http://klockworkkugler.com/2010/10/20/what-could-have-been-darren-aronofskys-batman-year-one/


What the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck :lol: ?

Yeah, maybe I would've liked the movie, by knowing for sure that it's deffinitely not the Batman I'm used to.


I've been meaning to read the script but I've held out from doing so because I want to read "Batman: Year One" first, just to get a full grasp of how insanely Aronofsky and Miller departed from the source material.

_________________
My unofficial and offical work-> http://www.youtube.com/movieboyandco


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:58 pm 
Online
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 11598
Location: Monster Island (Really New York)
TheMovieDude wrote:
feliciano182 wrote:
Godziller66 wrote:
http://klockworkkugler.com/2010/10/20/what-could-have-been-darren-aronofskys-batman-year-one/


What the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck :lol: ?

Yeah, maybe I would've liked the movie, by knowing for sure that it's deffinitely not the Batman I'm used to.


I've been meaning to read the script but I've held out from doing so because I want to read "Batman: Year One" first, just to get a full grasp of how insanely Aronofsky and Miller departed from the source material.

Well, I don't think you need to actually read it to figure that out. It seems like they only used the title as far as their "source material" was concerned.

_________________
"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for." I agree with the second part.
Image
"There's a cello in your house now."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:03 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
Godziller66 wrote:
Well, I don't think you need to actually read it to figure that out. It seems like they only used the title as far as their "source material" was concerned.


Not to be a purist prick, but they could've done something even better and original without having to name it "Batman".

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:08 pm 
Online
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 11598
Location: Monster Island (Really New York)
feliciano182 wrote:
Godziller66 wrote:
Well, I don't think you need to actually read it to figure that out. It seems like they only used the title as far as their "source material" was concerned.


Not to be a purist prick, but they could've done something even better and original without having to name it "Batman".

I agree. It sounds like Aronofsky didn't really care about the film regardless, though, and wanted to use it simply to advance his future film career.

And based on that alone, I think we can all agree he should never direct a Batman movie.

_________________
"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for." I agree with the second part.
Image
"There's a cello in your house now."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:20 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
Godziller66 wrote:
I agree. It sounds like Aronofsky didn't really care about the film regardless, though, and wanted to use it simply to advance his future film career.

And based on that alone, I think we can all agree he should never direct a Batman movie.


What surprised me at first was that half of this was Frank Miller actually.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:25 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 7773
Location: 1060 W. Addison St.
^That

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:38 pm 
Online
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 11598
Location: Monster Island (Really New York)
feliciano182 wrote:
Godziller66 wrote:
I agree. It sounds like Aronofsky didn't really care about the film regardless, though, and wanted to use it simply to advance his future film career.

And based on that alone, I think we can all agree he should never direct a Batman movie.


What surprised me at first was that half of this was Frank Miller actually.

Well, he did write All-Star Batman and Robin.

_________________
"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for." I agree with the second part.
Image
"There's a cello in your house now."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 7773
Location: 1060 W. Addison St.
Godziller66 wrote:
feliciano182 wrote:
Godziller66 wrote:
I agree. It sounds like Aronofsky didn't really care about the film regardless, though, and wanted to use it simply to advance his future film career.

And based on that alone, I think we can all agree he should never direct a Batman movie.


What surprised me at first was that half of this was Frank Miller actually.

Well, he did write All-Star Batman and Robin.


It's not even that, he just can't write screenplays.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:08 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
Godziller66 wrote:
Well, he did write All-Star Batman and Robin.


Yeah, All-Star B&R has nothing to do with any of what Aronofsky and Miller thought about :lol:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:09 pm 
Online
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 11598
Location: Monster Island (Really New York)
feliciano182 wrote:
Godziller66 wrote:
Well, he did write All-Star Batman and Robin.


Yeah, All-Star B&R has nothing to do with any of what Aronofsky and Miller thought about :lol:

I was using it as an example to say that Miller is more than capable of writing some fairly terrible stuff.

_________________
"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for." I agree with the second part.
Image
"There's a cello in your house now."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
Godziller66 wrote:
I was using it as an example to say that Miller is more than capable of writing some fairly terrible stuff.


Now I understand thee.

Wish Smutty and Brooky were on the same page though !

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:42 am 
Offline
Genetically-Altered Lynx

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:57 pm
Posts: 2588
arronfsky imo is just like tarantino is that they should never do comic book films because they will change source material to fit their vision because they are big on original ideas

big al the black mechanic :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:09 am 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 9:19 pm
Posts: 10685
Location: Arkham, Mass.
Project862006 wrote:
arronfsky imo is just like tarantino is that they should never do comic book films because they will change source material to fit their vision because they are big on original ideas

big al the black mechanic :lol:


Tarantino has even said he'd consider doing a super hero movie, but not a comic book movie becaus ehe'd have too many fanboy hoops to jump through

_________________
@RealSlimCAvery
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:34 am 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
Dr. Brooklyn wrote:
Tarantino has even said he'd consider doing a super hero movie, but not a comic book movie becaus ehe'd have too many fanboy hoops to jump through


Sadly, this is true, maybe if we embraced these movies as "elseworld" stories, then these directors might be more inclined to take liberties.

Then again, the last time somebody took "a few liberties" with my favorite comic book character.......weeeeeeell.......

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
...look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:09 pm
Posts: 2114
Project862006 wrote:
arronfsky imo is just like tarantino is that they should never do comic book films because they will change source material to fit their vision because they are big on original ideas

big al the black mechanic :lol:

Yeah. And we know how some people here feel towards "change."

STAGNATION FOR THE WIN!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:15 pm 
Offline
Indestructible Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 10096
SkaOreo wrote:
Yeah. And we know how some people here feel towards "change."

STAGNATION FOR THE WIN!!!!


Legitimately asking, would you have been okay for a Batman movie with Aronofsky and Miller's changes ?

Maybe our own perception of how superhero movies needs to change, I can deal with that, but at the same time, why not make your own new superhero if you're changing that much ?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
Vigilante
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 5:42 pm
Posts: 94
Location: Spain
feliciano182 wrote:
SkaOreo wrote:
Yeah. And we know how some people here feel towards "change."

STAGNATION FOR THE WIN!!!!


Legitimately asking, would you have been okay for a Batman movie with Aronofsky and Miller's changes ?

Maybe our own perception of how superhero movies needs to change, I can deal with that, but at the same time, why not make your own new superhero if you're changing that much ?


I'm with you. We wouldn't have Star Wars, Darkman or RoboCop if directors hadn't had to invent their own stuff because of copyrights!

I would have been okay with Aronofsky's Year One... as a comic book. No one would be as mad as to produce that elsewords into a marketed movie.
That's why Miller should stick to comic books: they're fairly less expensive to produce, and they don't get as much media exposure if they're garbage. He's been allowed way too much because of his name.


And knowing DC, we'll have Raja Gosnell directing the next Batman.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:23 pm 
Offline
Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:26 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: the City
ElOctopodo wrote:
feliciano182 wrote:
SkaOreo wrote:
Yeah. And we know how some people here feel towards "change."

STAGNATION FOR THE WIN!!!!


Legitimately asking, would you have been okay for a Batman movie with Aronofsky and Miller's changes ?

Maybe our own perception of how superhero movies needs to change, I can deal with that, but at the same time, why not make your own new superhero if you're changing that much ?


I'm with you. We wouldn't have Star Wars, Darkman or RoboCop if directors hadn't had to invent their own stuff because of copyrights!

I would have been okay with Aronofsky's Year One... as a comic book. No one would be as mad as to produce that elsewords into a marketed movie.
That's why Miller should stick to comic books: they're fairly less expensive to produce, and they don't get as much media exposure if they're garbage. He's been allowed way too much because of his name.


And knowing DC, we'll have Raja Gosnell directing the next Batman.

Knowing DC, they realize that batman is more marketable now than ever. Why the hell would they take a chance on a stupid-ass director like that?

Look at all the directors they've picked for their movies. Hell even Bryan Singer had a very public success with X-Men one and two.
Martin Campbell
Christopher Nolan
Zack Synder

these are not tiny names people.

Even looking back. Joel Schumacher's LARGEST fuck up WAS the batman movies.
This guy did a film adaption of Phantom of the Opera and some other damn decent flicks.

DC isn't cheap with director's. They just have no fucking clue who to put where.
I say they got lucky with Snyder and Nolan.

But if you think they're going to turn over their biggest moneymaker to the director of Scooby Doo...

I think you better just... rethink that thought.

_________________
My Blog of Movie Reviews and Such
Image
I'll be right back. I gotta go see a man about a mule.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:24 pm 
Offline
Vigilante
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 5:42 pm
Posts: 94
Location: Spain
NiteOwl wrote:
ElOctopodo wrote:
feliciano182 wrote:
SkaOreo wrote:
Yeah. And we know how some people here feel towards "change."

STAGNATION FOR THE WIN!!!!


Legitimately asking, would you have been okay for a Batman movie with Aronofsky and Miller's changes ?

Maybe our own perception of how superhero movies needs to change, I can deal with that, but at the same time, why not make your own new superhero if you're changing that much ?


I'm with you. We wouldn't have Star Wars, Darkman or RoboCop if directors hadn't had to invent their own stuff because of copyrights!

I would have been okay with Aronofsky's Year One... as a comic book. No one would be as mad as to produce that elsewords into a marketed movie.
That's why Miller should stick to comic books: they're fairly less expensive to produce, and they don't get as much media exposure if they're garbage. He's been allowed way too much because of his name.


And knowing DC, we'll have Raja Gosnell directing the next Batman.

Knowing DC, they realize that batman is more marketable now than ever. Why the hell would they take a chance on a stupid-ass director like that?

Look at all the directors they've picked for their movies. Hell even Bryan Singer had a very public success with X-Men one and two.
Martin Campbell
Christopher Nolan
Zack Synder

these are not tiny names people.

Even looking back. Joel Schumacher's LARGEST fuck up WAS the batman movies.
This guy did a film adaption of Phantom of the Opera and some other damn decent flicks.

DC isn't cheap with director's. They just have no fucking clue who to put where.
I say they got lucky with Snyder and Nolan.

But if you think they're going to turn over their biggest moneymaker to the director of Scooby Doo...

I think you better just... rethink that thought.


I... thought about it better.
Turns out I'm still pissed about "Lobo" being directed by the "Kitty Galore" guy. :mrgreen:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: RuiBK and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.131s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]