WatchmenComicMovie.com Forum


Talk about the Watchmen comic book mini-series and film
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 2:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:05 am 
Offline
Silk Swinger of Suburbia
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:10 am
Posts: 1789
CSFRITZ wrote:
How about the horrible casting choice of Bana for Bruce Banner?
Banner is sppose to have some scientific nerdy quality...and Bana had none!
He was more shy and timid then scientific...

How about the awful "comic book panel" sequences they tried to do but failed miserably? It was rabbit poop!

How about the casting for the of Nick Nolte???? Sorry...I just really hate his films, and acting ability

Come on AYB....A 7 out a 10? Thats way above average!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The move is at least a 3 out of 10.


CSFRITZ wrote:
didnt Munich suck huge emu eggs?

I heard that movie was crap...I never saw it so I cant really have 2 cents to throw in on that particular film...

Maybe the bombing of that film was due to bana...not sure


Munich probably 'sucked' because semites are a minorship...and even considering the movie did not justify whatever jewish did, the fact it was directed by a jewish director probably granted it a reputation of a pro-semite work - specially by people who didn't see the movie. however spielberg makes it subtle, however quite noticeable, that there's no right side in such issues and specially in that particular one. well packed, wrapped and delivered. great work with a very strong and heavy thematics

about hulk issues:

eric bana isn't great, but bruce banner is a moron. he's just a brilliant scientist with a huh...marvellous (?) accident in his life history. fine cast for me. we should'nt expect him babbling about every kind of math/physics theory that alan moore-ish relates to what the Hulk is.

nick nolte is a HELL of a great actor when there's a HELL of a part for him. I'm not talking about romantic adventures with Julia Roberts. He has great works in his career. you gotta know and believe the guy. i surely didn't like Jeff Bridges cast for Iron Man when I first heard of. Jeff Bridges and Keanu Reeves have always been, in my opinion, actors that play themselves in every movie. they have their shortcuts, their Tom Cruise-isms (the magic, shining bright smile that save almost every scene when he's sucking in his autopilot act)...but this time, Jeff Bridges REALLY impressed me. what a villain, what an Obadiah he was.

and the same went for Nick. He was always a shade of himself in movies. but in Hulk, well, he was a great shade of himself. the best shade of himself he could be. I have no complaints.


i guess the comic-book split screen, well...it was a try. nobody can blame ang lee for bringing something different. it sucked? yes. but here, between you and me...would you prefer watching a movie with those failing editing gimmicks or 15min. of ben affleck attempting to be matt murdock with his woodface grim and such a horrible hair?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:09 am 
Offline
Silk Swinger of Suburbia
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:10 am
Posts: 1789
Watchmaker wrote:
Personally, I think that Ang Lee's did a really good job of capturing the psychology of the Hulk. I guess I'm also one of the few that really enjoyed Ang's version. I though everything was great about that movie up until the final "battle". I don't like to compare that one though with this new one mostly because they both are trying to achieve two different things (one is centered on the character development and symbolism the other on the action and pure entertainment value).


that's the point. ang lee brought some respect to the carachter. i mean, it took time, lots of screening time until he first show. but that's fine...for me, alone. it's just what i expected from hulk. what would drive a man to become such furious, organic, killing machine? oh, he was exposed to gamma rays. wow...that's amazing...and why didn't he become a raging bubble?

ang lee created a logical scenario for everything and even if 40 min. took a lot of time in the movie that could be filled with action, what i saw after that was enough and balanced. great job.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:51 pm 
Offline
Alien Squid Monster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:52 pm
Posts: 105
Location: New York
Mere Being wrote:
Watchmaker wrote:
Personally, I think that Ang Lee's did a really good job of capturing the psychology of the Hulk. I guess I'm also one of the few that really enjoyed Ang's version. I though everything was great about that movie up until the final "battle". I don't like to compare that one though with this new one mostly because they both are trying to achieve two different things (one is centered on the character development and symbolism the other on the action and pure entertainment value).


that's the point. ang lee brought some respect to the carachter. i mean, it took time, lots of screening time until he first show. but that's fine...for me, alone. it's just what i expected from hulk. what would drive a man to become such furious, organic, killing machine? oh, he was exposed to gamma rays. wow...that's amazing...and why didn't he become a raging bubble?

ang lee created a logical scenario for everything and even if 40 min. took a lot of time in the movie that could be filled with action, what i saw after that was enough and balanced. great job.


I will definitely agree that Ang Lee did do a good job capturing the psychological torment portion of the Hulk's character. But the problem is that there's more to that character than that. That's simply where he started. You have a character who's rage comes from deep inner turmoil. Now where do you go from there? I'll where you DON'T go.. fighting radioactive poodles.

Combine the two movies - Sam Eliot as Thunderbolt Ross and the character history from Ang Lee, and everything else from the Incredible Hulk - and there it is.

Gravy.

_________________
He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:30 am 
Offline
Silk Swinger of Suburbia
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:10 am
Posts: 1789
well, I went seeing it last night. what a movie. great, I mean, not grrrrreeeeeeeeeeat, but great, yes. it felt like a very good comic book. the special effects are a blast.

i can safely say that ang lee gave the carachter respect and leterrier made it rock.

the only sad note must go for a person I really like - Liv Tyler. she's probably on the top100 nicest people of Earth list, but her acting in that movie was...lame. dunno why. she's such a fine actress, but it feels like caring a little baby pretty harmed her skills - differently of other screwed mind actresses like jolie. could the fact that she's so sweet be the problem?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:25 am 
Offline
The Watcher
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:58 am
Posts: 3506
Location: New York
I saw it. I liked it a lot. I felt it was as good as Iron Man.

I can't comment on it being better or worse then the Ang Lee version because, in all honesty, I didn't see it in the theater, and I couldn't sit through it for more than 10 minutes without changing the channel when it was on TV.

_________________
Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:51 am 
Offline
Silk Swinger of Suburbia
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:10 am
Posts: 1789
DoomsdayClock wrote:
I saw it. I liked it a lot. I felt it was as good as Iron Man.
I can't comment on it being better or worse then the Ang Lee version because, in all honesty, I didn't see it in the theater, and I couldn't sit through it for more than 10 minutes without changing the channel when it was on TV.


me too

now I want u guys to tell how did u like our brazilian Martina (Débora Nascimento)

her father is a police delegate

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:53 am 
Offline
The Watcher
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:58 am
Posts: 3506
Location: New York
Mere Being wrote:
Image

I'm trying to decide which one I would like to be more: the flute or the dog.

_________________
Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:58 am 
Offline
Silk Swinger of Suburbia
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:10 am
Posts: 1789
Image

Image

Image

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:59 am 
Offline
Silk Swinger of Suburbia
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:10 am
Posts: 1789
DoomsdayClock wrote:
Mere Being wrote:
Image

I'm trying to decide which one I would like to be more: the flute or the dog.


you seem to be a leg person

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.201s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]