FANTASTIC!!
Okay, maybe I'm biased because my question was chosen (thanks Curi and DDC!), but that interview really lived up to Curi's hype!
Its great that Gibbons himself has cleared up our debate over the Comedian's death...we were all wrong and all right
Love that arabic saying...
When I asked my question I wasn't expecting an answer that long!!
Juicy stuff in there!
"I’m not going to say anything that’s going to give away specific questions about what’s in or what’s out, because I don’t really think that’s helpful to anybody."
I think he's been reading the board some more! Now that I think about it, he's probably right... if we comprehensively found out tomorrow for example that the squid isn't in, most of us would be angry! But none of us would have any idea whether the replacement ending would work and, because no-one related to the film can possibly go into details explaining publicly why the squidless ending works, we wouldn't know until the film's released! So what we'd get is 4 months of people moaning about how the film is going to be awful...
Alternatively, you can choose to interpret Gibbons' words as saying the squid as out...but he wouldn't recommend you do
"Some scenes aren’t."
It's pretty inevitable...does that mean that a few of the best scenes in the comic are going to be cut? He says that a lot of his favourite scenes are in, but the film wouldn't make sense if it was just a "best of Watchmen"...He names the Black Freighter, but I think he's trying to avoid naming what we don't already know has been cut...see above...
"There are scenes in the movie that weren’t in the graphic novel."
Don't know what to think of this...I was hoping that the new stuff would be limited to the opening montage, but apparently not... I can trust Zack and co. that the new scenes are necessary, though....
I'm very glad to hear that Zack's apparently nailed the uniqueness of the eras..."very clearly identifiable" sounds great... I'm sure they'd have to do more than a comic to do this, because there's no benefit of turning back a page or two here... if Zack's achieved the clarity Dave is talking about, I'll be very happy... DDC, do Gibbons' words ring true to you having seen Chapter 4 in film? Is he exxagerating a little, or is his praise deserved?
It's good to hear about the performances...dear old Malin won't be crap according to Dave, so that's good news...(neither will Goode, for those that dislike him)
I would love to see a powerhouse performance or two, though, so I'm hoping Dave is merely trying to protect the feelings of those who aren't JEH for example...
So all in all, it sounds like we're going to be very pleased with the full product, even if there'll be a couple of changes at specific points...
Quite refreshing that the legend who is Dave Gibbons is saying that they don't really matter...
_________________
Dr. Brooklyn wrote:
it was tying it into the rape-revenge stories and making light of a verys erious sub-genre that kind of offended me.