the J.O.B. strikes again! nice answer!
RE: the Comedian...I agree he's not just a "cock-bag" (!)
I think Moore wants him to know a lot of what's going on better than anyone else...
no-one here has identified with the comedian that much on their first reading, right?
Nevertheless our own knowledge of history tells us that the Comedian saw the US's future, right? There's the infamous plan-burning incident and in 'Nam didn't he say that America would've really struggled if it weren't for the Dr?
I think Moore's trying to undermine stereotype....he's trying to say that just cos the Comedian is far from "the good guy" doesn't make him wrong, as those in who go see this in the cinema might think, but that doesn't make him "better" than any of the others (a mistake i make too often!)
As for redemption, perhaps the Comedian stays in NYC - weakened - because he is ready to die and refuses, even now, to change his viewpoint.
Y'know my two main heroes of the 20th Century are 1) Alan Moore (his ex-wife and he shared a girlfriend for experiments, just thought you'd like to know!) 2) Malcolm X (see avatar)
Recently I've been reading a lot on the latter (for history coursework, but i'm really enjoying it) and again and again it strikes me that he shares aspects of personality with the Comedian.
I'll finish this post with one little titbit and maybe post some more later.
James H Cone, Martin & Malcolm & America wrote:
White liberal hypocrisy was Malcolm’s favourite target. In a late December 1964 interview, he talked to the African-American journalist Claude Lewis about the importance of humour for keeping one’s sanity in a society which says one thing but does the opposite. “Anything that’s paradoxical has to have some humour in it or it’ll crack you up. You know that? You put hot water in a cold glass, it’ll crack. Because it’s a contrast, a paradox. And America is such a paradoxical society, hypocritically paradoxical, that if you don’t have some humour, you’ll crack up.” He burst into laughter as he talked.
_________________
Dr. Brooklyn wrote:
it was tying it into the rape-revenge stories and making light of a verys erious sub-genre that kind of offended me.