It's to encourage lurkers to post. If you still don't like it after that explanation, please feel free to discuss it with Broken Finger or Kingmob. I can assure you will give the issue the attention it deserves.
I think Hollis's second post was very smart and thoughtful, and I can only hope that it's indicative of what's to come.
Hollis, please further favor us with your insight, and you'll be out of the "So Impotent" range before you know it. I will say that the moniker you've taken umbrage to was chosen by our most gracious host Doomsday Clock, and he is known to have a...peculiar
sense of humor. Some might call it "tasteless." Others, "offensive." Still others might call it "shit."
After a while, you get used to it, and a little while later you're not sure how you ever got along without it.
Besides, he's an almost direct conduit into what's happening with the movie version of Watchmen, if you're into that sort of thing, and as such is an invaluable source of information.
I'm a little disappointed they would take Rorschach's funny offhand remark seriously that Veidt might be gay.
I think Hollis's one line here sums up all concerns about the movie quite nicely. From Rorschach's martial arts dynamo of an attack against superior forces to the Comedian's tea drinking, most of us are concerned about how this thing will be presentd to the public. Hopefully, until March comes around, we can have more comments from folks like Hollis, and less from vermin like the Brass Moustache and Fruityfallout.
IMHO, or whatever little acronym we're supposed to use now to soften our opinion amd make it more palatable.